RepoDAO Contribution and Merit Framework
Overview
The RepoDAO framework implements an integrated dual-system approach for measuring, rewarding, and incentivizing participation. This framework combines immediate contribution tracking (Proof of Contribution) with long-term reputation building (Proof of Merit) to create a comprehensive meritocratic ecosystem.
Proof of Contribution (PoC)
Contribution Types and Scoring
The PoC system recognizes two primary types of contributions:
Repo Contributions
The repo contribution consists of all positive improvement to the repo itself, including but not limited to the following. The contribution would be evaluated first time the repo is registered and periodically reevaluated.
Core architecture and initial codebase development
Fundamental documentation and specifications
Critical infrastructure implementation
Critical bug fixes and security patches
Performance optimizations
Documentation improvements
Community support activities
Quest-based Contributions
The quest based contributions are based on pre-defined tasks. It requires clear definitions for task objective, timeline, rewards and descriptions. It may include but is not limited to the following items. It is common that quests can generate Repo Contributions, these contributions would be separately evaluated during every Repo Contributions re-evaluation phase.
Feature development
Research initiatives
Security audits
Community development programs
Scoring System
PoC Score
The system evaluates basic contributions using engagement and reference metrics:
PoC Score = α₁E + α₂R
Where:
E: Engagement (repository activity across all contribution categories)
R: References (external impact across all contribution categories)
α₁: Engagement weight factor (0.6 by default)
α₂: Reference weight factor (0.4 by default)
Quest Rewards
Quest completion rewards are calculated as:
R(p,q) = Pool(q) × [W(p,q) + B(p)]
Where:
R(p,q): Participant reward
Pool(q): Quest reward pool
W(p,q): Contribution weight
B(p): Reputation bonus multiplier
Reward Distribution
Immediate Rewards
Direct task compensation
Performance-based bonuses
Innovation incentives
Long-term Benefits
Revenue sharing (licensing and usage fees)
Governance rights
Strategic decision-making participation
Token emission programs
Proof of Merit (PoM)
Scoring System
The PoM score combines technical performance with ecosystem engagement:
PoM = (Technical Performance × w₁) + (Ecosystem Engagement × w₂)
Technical Performance (TP)
TP = (QC + II + CV) / 3
Components:
QC: Quality of Contributions
II: Innovation Impact
CV: Community Value
Ecosystem Engagement (EE)
EE = (GP + SU + CI) / 3
Components:
GP: Governance Participation
SU: Service Utilization
CI: Community Interaction
Benefits Structure
All benefits scale logarithmically according to:
B(PoM) = Bmax × ln(1 + PoM) / ln(2)
Governance Rights
Proposal weight: 1 + (PoM × 0.5)
Voting power: 1 + (PoM × 0.3)
Resource allocation influence: PoM × 100%
Capital Access
Interest rate reduction: PoM × 25%
Collateral requirement: 100% - (PoM × 30%)
Credit limit: Base × (1 + PoM)
Infrastructure Services
Fee reduction: PoM × 20%
Priority access based on PoM tier
Resource allocation: Base × (1 + PoM × 0.5)
Value Distribution
Value Sharing
Licensing revenue share
Usage fee distributions
Partnership revenue allocation
Token Emissions
Regular distribution events
Performance-based bonuses
Long-term incentive programs
System Integration
The PoC and PoM systems work together to create a self-reinforcing cycle:
PoC scores drive immediate rewards and contribute to PoM calculations
PoM scores determine long-term benefits and influence PoC reward multipliers
Both systems incentivize sustained, quality participation through their complementary reward structures
This integrated approach ensures that contributors are rewarded both for immediate value creation and long-term ecosystem engagement, while maintaining transparent and mathematically sound distribution of benefits.
Last updated